Review



mouse anti delta fosb antibody  (Proteintech)


Bioz Verified Symbol Proteintech is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Proteintech mouse anti delta fosb antibody
    ( A and B ) Changes in MAP ( A ) and HR ( B ) measured by radiotelemetry before, during and after CUMS in WKY rats, BHRs and age-matched unstressed WKY rats and BHRs ( n = 6 rats in each group). Data are expressed as means ± SEM. * P < 0.05 for CUMS BHR versus unstressed BHRs, # P < 0.05 for CUMS BHR versus CUMS WKY, ^ P < 0.05 for CUMS WKY versus unstressed WKY. Repeated measures of 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. ( C ) Representative immunofluorescence images showing CRF immunopositive neurons (green), <t>delta-FosB</t> immunopositive neurons (red), and CRF and delta-FosB double-positive neurons in the CeA of WKY, CUMS WKY, BHR, and CUMS BHR group of rats ( n = 5 rats in each group). ( D and E ) Summary data showing the numbers of CRF-positive neurons ( D ) and delta-FosB positive neurons ( E ) in the CeA of these 4 groups. ( F ) The percentage of CRF and delta-FosB double-positive neurons in the CeA of these 4 groups ( n = 5 rats in each group). Data are expressed as means ± SEM. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests.
    Mouse Anti Delta Fosb Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 144 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+antidelta+fosb+antibody/pmc12987618-158-7-26?v=Proteintech
    Average 95 stars, based on 144 article reviews
    mouse anti delta fosb antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Chloride homeostasis dysfunction drives hyperactivation of corticotropin-releasing factor-expressing neurons in the amygdala in stress-induced hypertension"

    Article Title: Chloride homeostasis dysfunction drives hyperactivation of corticotropin-releasing factor-expressing neurons in the amygdala in stress-induced hypertension

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    doi: 10.1172/JCI195536

    ( A and B ) Changes in MAP ( A ) and HR ( B ) measured by radiotelemetry before, during and after CUMS in WKY rats, BHRs and age-matched unstressed WKY rats and BHRs ( n = 6 rats in each group). Data are expressed as means ± SEM. * P < 0.05 for CUMS BHR versus unstressed BHRs, # P < 0.05 for CUMS BHR versus CUMS WKY, ^ P < 0.05 for CUMS WKY versus unstressed WKY. Repeated measures of 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. ( C ) Representative immunofluorescence images showing CRF immunopositive neurons (green), delta-FosB immunopositive neurons (red), and CRF and delta-FosB double-positive neurons in the CeA of WKY, CUMS WKY, BHR, and CUMS BHR group of rats ( n = 5 rats in each group). ( D and E ) Summary data showing the numbers of CRF-positive neurons ( D ) and delta-FosB positive neurons ( E ) in the CeA of these 4 groups. ( F ) The percentage of CRF and delta-FosB double-positive neurons in the CeA of these 4 groups ( n = 5 rats in each group). Data are expressed as means ± SEM. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests.
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A and B ) Changes in MAP ( A ) and HR ( B ) measured by radiotelemetry before, during and after CUMS in WKY rats, BHRs and age-matched unstressed WKY rats and BHRs ( n = 6 rats in each group). Data are expressed as means ± SEM. * P < 0.05 for CUMS BHR versus unstressed BHRs, # P < 0.05 for CUMS BHR versus CUMS WKY, ^ P < 0.05 for CUMS WKY versus unstressed WKY. Repeated measures of 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. ( C ) Representative immunofluorescence images showing CRF immunopositive neurons (green), delta-FosB immunopositive neurons (red), and CRF and delta-FosB double-positive neurons in the CeA of WKY, CUMS WKY, BHR, and CUMS BHR group of rats ( n = 5 rats in each group). ( D and E ) Summary data showing the numbers of CRF-positive neurons ( D ) and delta-FosB positive neurons ( E ) in the CeA of these 4 groups. ( F ) The percentage of CRF and delta-FosB double-positive neurons in the CeA of these 4 groups ( n = 5 rats in each group). Data are expressed as means ± SEM. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests.

    Techniques Used: Immunofluorescence, Comparison



    Similar Products

    95
    Proteintech mouse anti delta fosb antibody
    ( A and B ) Changes in MAP ( A ) and HR ( B ) measured by radiotelemetry before, during and after CUMS in WKY rats, BHRs and age-matched unstressed WKY rats and BHRs ( n = 6 rats in each group). Data are expressed as means ± SEM. * P < 0.05 for CUMS BHR versus unstressed BHRs, # P < 0.05 for CUMS BHR versus CUMS WKY, ^ P < 0.05 for CUMS WKY versus unstressed WKY. Repeated measures of 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. ( C ) Representative immunofluorescence images showing CRF immunopositive neurons (green), <t>delta-FosB</t> immunopositive neurons (red), and CRF and delta-FosB double-positive neurons in the CeA of WKY, CUMS WKY, BHR, and CUMS BHR group of rats ( n = 5 rats in each group). ( D and E ) Summary data showing the numbers of CRF-positive neurons ( D ) and delta-FosB positive neurons ( E ) in the CeA of these 4 groups. ( F ) The percentage of CRF and delta-FosB double-positive neurons in the CeA of these 4 groups ( n = 5 rats in each group). Data are expressed as means ± SEM. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests.
    Mouse Anti Delta Fosb Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+antidelta+fosb+antibody/pmc12987618-158-7-26?v=Proteintech
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti delta fosb antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Proteintech mouse antidelta fosb antibody
    ( A and B ) Changes in MAP ( A ) and HR ( B ) measured by radiotelemetry before, during and after CUMS in WKY rats, BHRs and age-matched unstressed WKY rats and BHRs ( n = 6 rats in each group). Data are expressed as means ± SEM. * P < 0.05 for CUMS BHR versus unstressed BHRs, # P < 0.05 for CUMS BHR versus CUMS WKY, ^ P < 0.05 for CUMS WKY versus unstressed WKY. Repeated measures of 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. ( C ) Representative immunofluorescence images showing CRF immunopositive neurons (green), <t>delta-FosB</t> immunopositive neurons (red), and CRF and delta-FosB double-positive neurons in the CeA of WKY, CUMS WKY, BHR, and CUMS BHR group of rats ( n = 5 rats in each group). ( D and E ) Summary data showing the numbers of CRF-positive neurons ( D ) and delta-FosB positive neurons ( E ) in the CeA of these 4 groups. ( F ) The percentage of CRF and delta-FosB double-positive neurons in the CeA of these 4 groups ( n = 5 rats in each group). Data are expressed as means ± SEM. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests.
    Mouse Antidelta Fosb Antibody, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+antidelta+fosb+antibody/10__1172_slash_jci195536-184-7-26?v=Proteintech
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse antidelta fosb antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc mouse anti δfosb antibody
    rVNS increases excitatory neurotransmission in CeL and inhibitory neurotransmission in CeM. (A) The timeline of the experiments. (B) Expression <t>of</t> <t>c-Fos</t> positive cells (green) and <t>ΔFosB</t> positive cells (red) in the centrolateral amygdala (CeL) and centromedial amygdala (CeM) of rVNS-treated rats compared with sham rats. Arrows indicated co-labeled cells. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C) rVNS treatment increased c-Fos and ΔFosB expression in the CeL, but no difference in CeM. n = 12 slices from 3 rats per group. (D) Representative traces of AMPAR-mediated mEPSCs in the CeL from sham and rVNS-treated rats. Scale bar, 20 pA and 2 s. (E) Cumulative probabilities of mEPSCs amplitude and statistics of mEPSCs amplitude for representative cells from each group. rVNS increased the amplitude of mEPSCs by ∼20% relative to sham-treated rat. n = 13 cells for sham, n = 11 cells for rVNS. (F) Cumulative probabilities of mEPSCs frequency and statistics of mEPSCs frequency for representative cells from each group. The frequency of mEPSCs was significantly increased in rVNS-treated rat. n = 13 cells for sham, n = 11 cells for rVNS. (G) Representative mIPSCs recording in the CeL neurons from sham and rVNS-treated rats. Scale bar, 50 pA and 2 s. (H) Cumulative probabilities of mIPSCs amplitude and statistics of mIPSCs amplitude for representative cells from each group. rVNS had no effect on the amplitude of mIPSCs in rVNS-treated rats. n = 17 cells for each group. (I) Cumulative probabilities of mIPSCs frequency and statistics of mIPSCs frequency for representative cells from each group. The frequency of mIPSCs was unaltered in rVNS-treated rats. n = 17 cells for each group. (J) Representative mIPSCs traces in CeM neurons from sham and rVNS group. Scale bars, 50 pA and 2 s. (K) Cumulative probabilities of mIPSCs amplitude and statistics of mIPSCs amplitude for representative cells from each group. The amplitude of mIPSCs recorded in CeM neuron was increased significantly in rVNS-treated rats. n = 13 cells for sham, n = 15 cells for rVNS. (L) Cumulative probabilities of mIPSCs frequency and statistics of mIPSCs frequency for representative cells from each group. rVNS significantly increased the frequency of mIPSCs. n = 13 cells for sham, n = 15 cells for rVNS. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; n.s., not significant. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
    Mouse Anti δfosb Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+antidelta+fosb+antibody/pmc09170826-109-13-18?v=Cell+Signaling+Technology+Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse anti δfosb antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    ( A and B ) Changes in MAP ( A ) and HR ( B ) measured by radiotelemetry before, during and after CUMS in WKY rats, BHRs and age-matched unstressed WKY rats and BHRs ( n = 6 rats in each group). Data are expressed as means ± SEM. * P < 0.05 for CUMS BHR versus unstressed BHRs, # P < 0.05 for CUMS BHR versus CUMS WKY, ^ P < 0.05 for CUMS WKY versus unstressed WKY. Repeated measures of 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. ( C ) Representative immunofluorescence images showing CRF immunopositive neurons (green), delta-FosB immunopositive neurons (red), and CRF and delta-FosB double-positive neurons in the CeA of WKY, CUMS WKY, BHR, and CUMS BHR group of rats ( n = 5 rats in each group). ( D and E ) Summary data showing the numbers of CRF-positive neurons ( D ) and delta-FosB positive neurons ( E ) in the CeA of these 4 groups. ( F ) The percentage of CRF and delta-FosB double-positive neurons in the CeA of these 4 groups ( n = 5 rats in each group). Data are expressed as means ± SEM. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests.

    Journal: The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    Article Title: Chloride homeostasis dysfunction drives hyperactivation of corticotropin-releasing factor-expressing neurons in the amygdala in stress-induced hypertension

    doi: 10.1172/JCI195536

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A and B ) Changes in MAP ( A ) and HR ( B ) measured by radiotelemetry before, during and after CUMS in WKY rats, BHRs and age-matched unstressed WKY rats and BHRs ( n = 6 rats in each group). Data are expressed as means ± SEM. * P < 0.05 for CUMS BHR versus unstressed BHRs, # P < 0.05 for CUMS BHR versus CUMS WKY, ^ P < 0.05 for CUMS WKY versus unstressed WKY. Repeated measures of 2-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. ( C ) Representative immunofluorescence images showing CRF immunopositive neurons (green), delta-FosB immunopositive neurons (red), and CRF and delta-FosB double-positive neurons in the CeA of WKY, CUMS WKY, BHR, and CUMS BHR group of rats ( n = 5 rats in each group). ( D and E ) Summary data showing the numbers of CRF-positive neurons ( D ) and delta-FosB positive neurons ( E ) in the CeA of these 4 groups. ( F ) The percentage of CRF and delta-FosB double-positive neurons in the CeA of these 4 groups ( n = 5 rats in each group). Data are expressed as means ± SEM. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests.

    Article Snippet: Subsequently, the sections were incubated with a mouse anti-delta-FosB antibody (1:50, #sc-398595), a rabbit anti-CRF antibody (1:100, #A1122, Abclonal) or a rabbit anti-NKCC1 antibody (1:100, #13884, Proteintech) overnight at 4°C.

    Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Comparison

    rVNS increases excitatory neurotransmission in CeL and inhibitory neurotransmission in CeM. (A) The timeline of the experiments. (B) Expression of c-Fos positive cells (green) and ΔFosB positive cells (red) in the centrolateral amygdala (CeL) and centromedial amygdala (CeM) of rVNS-treated rats compared with sham rats. Arrows indicated co-labeled cells. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C) rVNS treatment increased c-Fos and ΔFosB expression in the CeL, but no difference in CeM. n = 12 slices from 3 rats per group. (D) Representative traces of AMPAR-mediated mEPSCs in the CeL from sham and rVNS-treated rats. Scale bar, 20 pA and 2 s. (E) Cumulative probabilities of mEPSCs amplitude and statistics of mEPSCs amplitude for representative cells from each group. rVNS increased the amplitude of mEPSCs by ∼20% relative to sham-treated rat. n = 13 cells for sham, n = 11 cells for rVNS. (F) Cumulative probabilities of mEPSCs frequency and statistics of mEPSCs frequency for representative cells from each group. The frequency of mEPSCs was significantly increased in rVNS-treated rat. n = 13 cells for sham, n = 11 cells for rVNS. (G) Representative mIPSCs recording in the CeL neurons from sham and rVNS-treated rats. Scale bar, 50 pA and 2 s. (H) Cumulative probabilities of mIPSCs amplitude and statistics of mIPSCs amplitude for representative cells from each group. rVNS had no effect on the amplitude of mIPSCs in rVNS-treated rats. n = 17 cells for each group. (I) Cumulative probabilities of mIPSCs frequency and statistics of mIPSCs frequency for representative cells from each group. The frequency of mIPSCs was unaltered in rVNS-treated rats. n = 17 cells for each group. (J) Representative mIPSCs traces in CeM neurons from sham and rVNS group. Scale bars, 50 pA and 2 s. (K) Cumulative probabilities of mIPSCs amplitude and statistics of mIPSCs amplitude for representative cells from each group. The amplitude of mIPSCs recorded in CeM neuron was increased significantly in rVNS-treated rats. n = 13 cells for sham, n = 15 cells for rVNS. (L) Cumulative probabilities of mIPSCs frequency and statistics of mIPSCs frequency for representative cells from each group. rVNS significantly increased the frequency of mIPSCs. n = 13 cells for sham, n = 15 cells for rVNS. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; n.s., not significant. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

    Journal: Neurobiology of Stress

    Article Title: Repeated vagus nerve stimulation produces anxiolytic effects via upregulation of AMPAR function in centrolateral amygdala of male rats

    doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2022.100453

    Figure Lengend Snippet: rVNS increases excitatory neurotransmission in CeL and inhibitory neurotransmission in CeM. (A) The timeline of the experiments. (B) Expression of c-Fos positive cells (green) and ΔFosB positive cells (red) in the centrolateral amygdala (CeL) and centromedial amygdala (CeM) of rVNS-treated rats compared with sham rats. Arrows indicated co-labeled cells. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C) rVNS treatment increased c-Fos and ΔFosB expression in the CeL, but no difference in CeM. n = 12 slices from 3 rats per group. (D) Representative traces of AMPAR-mediated mEPSCs in the CeL from sham and rVNS-treated rats. Scale bar, 20 pA and 2 s. (E) Cumulative probabilities of mEPSCs amplitude and statistics of mEPSCs amplitude for representative cells from each group. rVNS increased the amplitude of mEPSCs by ∼20% relative to sham-treated rat. n = 13 cells for sham, n = 11 cells for rVNS. (F) Cumulative probabilities of mEPSCs frequency and statistics of mEPSCs frequency for representative cells from each group. The frequency of mEPSCs was significantly increased in rVNS-treated rat. n = 13 cells for sham, n = 11 cells for rVNS. (G) Representative mIPSCs recording in the CeL neurons from sham and rVNS-treated rats. Scale bar, 50 pA and 2 s. (H) Cumulative probabilities of mIPSCs amplitude and statistics of mIPSCs amplitude for representative cells from each group. rVNS had no effect on the amplitude of mIPSCs in rVNS-treated rats. n = 17 cells for each group. (I) Cumulative probabilities of mIPSCs frequency and statistics of mIPSCs frequency for representative cells from each group. The frequency of mIPSCs was unaltered in rVNS-treated rats. n = 17 cells for each group. (J) Representative mIPSCs traces in CeM neurons from sham and rVNS group. Scale bars, 50 pA and 2 s. (K) Cumulative probabilities of mIPSCs amplitude and statistics of mIPSCs amplitude for representative cells from each group. The amplitude of mIPSCs recorded in CeM neuron was increased significantly in rVNS-treated rats. n = 13 cells for sham, n = 15 cells for rVNS. (L) Cumulative probabilities of mIPSCs frequency and statistics of mIPSCs frequency for representative cells from each group. rVNS significantly increased the frequency of mIPSCs. n = 13 cells for sham, n = 15 cells for rVNS. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; n.s., not significant. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

    Article Snippet: The primary antibodies included: rabbit anti-c-Fos (1:1000 dilution; Abcam, ab208942, Cambridge, UK) and mouse anti-ΔFosB antibody (1:1000 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology, 14695, Denvars, MA, USA).

    Techniques: Expressing, Labeling